Types of presentation
Oral Presentation
Presentation time for ORAL presentation is 10 minutes + 5 min for questions from the audience.
You shall make your presentation in a timely manner. Kindly note that the time is usually followed the the conference Chairman.
​
All presentations have to be made in English
Speakers are kindly asked to use the available in the Conference hall Laptop. Only if they have special reasons they may use their own laptops (in that case they have to inform the technical assistant before the session).
​
Only PowerPoint presentations on a CD-ROM/DVD or a USB Memory stick will be accepted.
Types of presentation
Oral Presentation
Presentation time for ORAL presentation is 10 minutes + 5 min for questions from the audience.
You shall make your presentation in a timely manner. Kindly note that the time is usually followed the the conference Chairman.
​
All presentations have to be made in English
Speakers are kindly asked to use the available in the Conference hall Laptop. Only if they have special reasons they may use their own laptops (in that case they have to inform the technical assistant before the session).
​
Only PowerPoint presentations on a CD-ROM/DVD or a USB Memory stick will be accepted.
Types of presentation
Oral Presentation
Presentation time for ORAL presentation is 10 minutes + 5 min for questions from the audience.
You shall make your presentation in a timely manner. Kindly note that the time is usually followed the the conference Chairman.
​
All presentations have to be made in English
Speakers are kindly asked to use the available in the Conference hall Laptop. Only if they have special reasons they may use their own laptops (in that case they have to inform the technical assistant before the session).
​
Only PowerPoint presentations on a CD-ROM/DVD or a USB Memory stick will be accepted.
Types of presentation
Oral Presentation
Presentation time for ORAL presentation is 10 minutes + 5 min for questions from the audience.
You shall make your presentation in a timely manner. Kindly note that the time is usually followed the the conference Chairman.
​
All presentations have to be made in English
Speakers are kindly asked to use the available in the Conference hall Laptop. Only if they have special reasons they may use their own laptops (in that case they have to inform the technical assistant before the session).
​
Only PowerPoint presentations on a CD-ROM/DVD or a USB Memory stick will be accepted.
Publication ethics
Authors
The Author declares that the manuscript is original and in its present form has not been published elsewhere in any form, that it has not been submitted to any journal/proceedings and that it will not be submitted to any other journal/proceedings, if it is accepted for publication in the GEOLINKS Conference Proceedings.
The Author is responsible for the research they have been done and for the results described in the paper.
The Author warrants that the article doesn't infringe upon any copyright, contains no libelous or otherwise unlawful statements, and does not otherwise infringe on the rights of others.
The Author transfers the copyright for this publication/article to the GEOLINKS Conferences.
The Author licenses to the Publisher the right to distribute the Article as a part of GEOLINKS Conference proceedings.
Submission Guidelines
Abstract Submission
An abstract between 300 to 500 words, clearly summarising the arguments, should be submitted before deadline.
The preferred length of paper (including footnotes) is 5,000 words (maximum limit). In general, please confine your paper between 10-12 pages, everything included.
​
​
​
It is author's responsibility to ensure that all references and citations are correct, and that the contribution does not contain any material that infringes copyright, or is defamatory, obscene or otherwise unlawful or litigious. Please check GEOLINKS Tips.
​
​
​
Copyright in the article will remain jointly with the owner of the copyright and the Publisher. By submitting an article to the conference, the owner of the copyright grants the publisher with a license to publish the article. The author warrants that he is the owner of all rights of copyright in the article. Where the author subsequently publishes the article, the author is requested to acknowledge the article appeared in the conference proceedings.
​
​
​
The Author(s) will indemnify and defend the Publisher against any claim, demand or recovery against the Publisher by reason of any violation of any proprietary right or copyright, or because of any libellous or scandalous matter contained in the Manuscript.
​
​
The Publisher will have the right to edit the work for the original edition and for any revision, provided that the meaning of the text is not materially altered.
Submission Guidelines
Abstract Submission
An abstract between 300 to 500 words, clearly summarising the arguments, should be submitted before deadline.
The preferred length of paper (including footnotes) is 5,000 words (maximum limit). In general, please confine your paper between 10-12 pages, everything included.
​
​
​
It is author's responsibility to ensure that all references and citations are correct, and that the contribution does not contain any material that infringes copyright, or is defamatory, obscene or otherwise unlawful or litigious. Please check GEOLINKS Tips.
​
​
​
Copyright in the article will remain jointly with the owner of the copyright and the Publisher. By submitting an article to the conference, the owner of the copyright grants the publisher with a license to publish the article. The author warrants that he is the owner of all rights of copyright in the article. Where the author subsequently publishes the article, the author is requested to acknowledge the article appeared in the conference proceedings.
​
​
​
The Author(s) will indemnify and defend the Publisher against any claim, demand or recovery against the Publisher by reason of any violation of any proprietary right or copyright, or because of any libellous or scandalous matter contained in the Manuscript.
​
​
The Publisher will have the right to edit the work for the original edition and for any revision, provided that the meaning of the text is not materially altered.
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Types of presentation
Proceedings 2020
All GEOLINKS 2020 participants get an online access to the full conference proceedings.
You can find the full digital books, including all accepted and published double blind peer-reviewed papers.
​

GEOLINKS Proceedings
Book 1 Volume 2
​Air Pollution and Climate Change
Biotechnologies
Environmental Geology
Soil Science
Water Resources
GEOLINKS Proceedings
Book 2 Volume 2
Ecology and Environmental Studies
Environmental Economics
Green Buildings Technology and Materials
Green Design and Sustainable Architecture
GEOLINKS International Conference 2019, Book 1
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY
CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE OF PALEONTOLOGICAL COLLECTIONS ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE MINING MUSEUM (ST. PETERSBURG)
Daria Bezgodova
ABSTRACT
​
The mining museum in St. Petersburg keeps numerous paleontological collections and materials on stratigraphy and historical geology. The story of its accumulation started at the first half of XIX century with the beginning of the earliest geological study of the European part of Russia (including the Russian journey of R. Murchison). The museum paleontological and stratigraphical fond includes the collections of scientific expeditions, personal geological excursions of scientists, acquisitions of the buying or exchange from abroad, collections, the study of which have not been published by the authors. Among the authors of the collections are some world-known paleontologists and geologists like Ch. Pander, A. Keyserling, G. Helmersen, K. Eichwald et al.
It is obvious that the greatest value has collections containing originals to books and articles on paleontology. These materials are well known among paleontologists thanks to Museum cataloges and references to samples in publications. However, most of the paleontological collections, numbering more than one hundred thousand samples, is unknown and is not in demand among specialists. Attribution and cataloging of these collections require a comprehensive analysis of their structure, including the definition of criteria for assessing their scientific or educational significance. Experience with paleontological collections in the Mining Museum has shown that the following criteria determine the greatest scientific value of the collections.
First: the origin from the classical sections described in the geological literature, which may be stratotypes or be in stratotypic areas. These samples can serve as a reference in the study of paleontological species, first described by the materials from these sections, if necessary, among them can be selected neotypus. Secondly, the value of the collection can be determined by its origin from the lost sections. The study of such materials allows learning about the stratigraphic interval and faunistic characteristics of these deposits, which is especially important in the case of unique locations for the study area. Third: collections from hardly accessible regions. These are materials from areas where special paleontological and stratigraphic studies are not currently being carried out and which are difficult for specialists to visit for geographical or political reasons. Fourth: the value of paleontological collections may increase depending on how fully they characterize a particular geological formation (or geological region in which several formations are developed). From this point of view, the most valuable are the materials of long-term systematic studies. The proposed article considers the examples of the collections of the Mining Museum in Saint-Petersburg the most interesting from the point of view of all of the proposed criteria or their combinations.
​
KEYWORDS
​
paleontological collections, natural-science collections, paleontological museum, Mining Museum, geological heritage.